Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Pavkovich v. USA
as 5:2024cv00117
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Ben Pavkovich
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Pavkovich v. USA
as 5:2024cv00112
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Ben Pavkovich
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Rutledge et al v. Wake Forest University School of Medicine et al
as 3:2024cv00404
Defendant:
William Richardson, Juilene Almond, Wake Forest University School of Medicine and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Rutledge, A M R and A D R
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v Polk County, et al
as 1:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Wayne Smith and Wayne K. Smith, Sr.
Defendant:
Polk County, Timothy Wright, Timothy L. Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Green v. Anderson
as 3:2023cv00668
Petitioner:
Albert Leroy Green, Jr.
Respondent:
Ben Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Friday v. Carver et al
as 1:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
Tevin Damato Friday
Defendant:
Ben Carver, FNU Cothran, Caroline Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Ishee et al
as 1:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
Andre David Williams
Defendant:
Todd E. Ishee, Ben Carver and Keven R. Chung
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cheeks v. Carver
as 3:2022cv00692
Petitioner:
Thomas Allen Cheeks
Respondent:
Ben Carver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hebb v. City of Asheville, North Carolina et al
as 1:2022cv00222
Plaintiff:
Zachary Hebb
Defendant:
City of Asheville, North Carolina and Ben Woody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crump v. Carver et al
as 3:2022cv00541
Plaintiff:
Ramar Dion Benjamin Crump
Defendant:
Ben Carver, Saint T. Tapp, David E. Cothron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
