Cases 1 - 10 of 14
David Atwood, II v. Ben Ford, et al
as 15-60454
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID GARLAND ATWOOD, II
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERIFF BEN FORD, Former Sheriff of Covington County, SHERIFF STANN SMITH, Current Sheriff of Covington County, DEPUTY HOLBROOKE, Covington County Sheriff's Department and others
Atwood v. Ford et al
as 2:2014cv00202
Plaintiff:
David Garland Atwood, II
Defendant:
Ben Ford, Stann Smith, Holbrooke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brister v. Ford et al
as 2:2012cv00071
Plaintiff:
Christian Lee Brister
Defendant:
Ben Ford , Brian Patterson and Joe Bullock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elmore v. State of Mississippi et al
as 2:2011cv00256
Plaintiff:
Travis Wynne Elmore
Defendant:
Ben Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Poole v. Ford et al
as 2:2011cv00158
Plaintiff:
Crawthorne Poole
Defendant:
Ben Ford, Brian Patterson and Angie H. Deil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McLaurin v. Ford et al
as 2:2011cv00149
Plaintiff:
James Keith McLaurin
Defendant:
Ben Ford, Brain Patterson and Angie Dielh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. Covington County Sheriff Department et al
as 2:2010cv00033
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lance Barnes
Defendant:
Covington County Sheriff Department, Ben Ford, Jim Kinslow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McLaurin v. Ford et al
as 2:2009cv00201
Plaintiff:
James Keith McLaurin
Defendant:
Ben Ford, Shad Harvey, Pamela Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yates v. Ford et al
as 2:2009cv00197
Plaintiff:
David Levi Yates
Defendant:
Ben Ford, Jim Kinslow and Angie Dielh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webb v. Ford et al
as 2:2009cv00187
Plaintiff:
Greg Allen Webb
Defendant:
Ben Ford, Jim Kinslow and Angie Dielh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
