Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Martinez v. Alves
as 1:2023cv10285
Petitioner:
Benjamin Martinez
Respondent:
Nelson Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Aviles-Lugo et al v. Ruiz-Feliciano et al
as 3:2022cv01028
Plaintiff:
Pedro J. Aviles Lugo, Luis A. Aviles Ruiz, Mirna I. Caraballo Dasta and others
Defendant:
Wilfredo Ruiz Feliciano, Norbert Morales Carrero, Maribel Rodriguez Vera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Martinez, et al v. Hospital San Cristobal, et al
as 14-1443
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ENID MARTINEZ, BENJAMIN MARTINEZ-QUINONEZ, LESLIE ANN WARD and others
Defendant - Appellee:
HOSPITAL SAN CRISTOBAL and TRIPLE-S INSURANCE
Interested Party:
HECTOR CORDERO-JIMENEZ
Martinez et al v. Hospital San Cristobal et al
as 3:2012cv01723
Plaintiff:
Enid Martinez , Benjamin Martinez-Quinonez , Leslie Ann Ward and others
Defendant:
Hospital San Cristobal, Continental Casualty Co. (CNA), SIMED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cruz-Vazquez, et al v. Mennonite General Hospital, In, et al
as 11-2297
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAZEL I. CRUZ-VAZQUEZ, RAUL A. CRUZ-RIVERA, LUCY I. VAZQUEZ-RIVERA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MENNONITE GENERAL HOSPITAL, INC., BRENDA M. TORRES-PEREZ, EDUARDO GOMEZ-TORRES and others
Cruz-Vazquez, et al v. Mennonite General Hospital, In, et al
as 09-1758
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAZEL I. CRUZ-VAZQUEZ, RAUL A. CRUZ-RIVERA, LUCY I. VAZQUEZ-RIVERA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MENNONITE GENERAL HOSPITAL, INC., BRENDA M. TORRES-PEREZ, EDUARDO GOMEZ-TORRES and others
Defendant:
MINERVA DIAZ-ARISTUD
Cruz-Vazquez et al v. Mennonite General Hospital, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv01236
Plaintiff:
Hazel I. Cruz-Vazquez, Raul A Cruz-Rivera, Lucy I. Vazquez-Rivera and others
Defendant:
Mennonite General Hospital, Inc., Torres, John Doe and others
Amicu:
Peter Poe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
