Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Ramirez-Alvarez v. George et al
as 1:2013cv00949
Plaintiff:
Aris Benjamin Ramirez-Alvarez
Defendant:
Christopher George, Joshua Reid, Jennifer Ritchey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv01589
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ramirez v. Power Plus Personnel.
as 4:2012mc00311
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Ramirez
Defendant:
Power Plus Personnel
Aris Ramirez-Alvarez v. Attorney General United State
as 12-1296
Petitioner:
ARIS BENJAMIN RAMIREZ-ALVAREZ
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Huff v. Pundt et al
as 2:2011cv00148
Plaintiff:
Chester Lowe Huff
Defendant:
Kimberly Pundt, Luis Pulido, Billy J. Raab and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melendez et al v. GK Grill LLC et al
as 1:2011cv00043
Plaintiff:
Victor Melendez , Filiberto Chavez , Ruben Santos Marcelino and others
Defendant:
GK Grill LLC and Jose Meirelles
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Kelly v. Trevino et al
as 5:2010cv00968
Defendant:
Raymond Almendarez, Matt Barber, Sandra Castenada and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Aris Ramirez-Alvarez
as 09-10702
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ARIS BENJAMIN RAMIREZ-ALVAREZ, also known as Joel Paul Nieves, Jr., also known as Benny Boy Ramirez, also known as Loco Ramirez
Ramirez v. Sico White and Braugh LLP et al
as 4:2007cv03440
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Ramirez
Defendant:
Sico White and Braugh LLP, Craig M Sico, John T. Flood, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Garden City Boxing Club, Inc. v. Ramirez et al
as 1:2007cv08124
Plaintiff:
Garden City Boxing Club, Inc.
Defendant:
Benjamin Ramirez and Benjamin Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
