Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00157
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rhodes et al v. West Virginia Division of Protective Services et al
as 2:2018cv01179
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Protective Services, Gregory Scott Fernatt, Travas Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Rhodes and Robert Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bumgarner v. Clendenen
as 5:2016cv05963
Plaintiff:
John E. Bumgarner
Defendant:
Jordan Clendenen, Daniel Hinkley, Jr., Jeremy Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunn v. Nicholas County, West Virginia County Commission et al
as 2:2014cv25532
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Bennett Dunn and Esther Mae Gibson
Defendant:
Nicholas County, West Virginia County Commission, Deputy John Doe #1, Deputy John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Games-Neely et al
as 3:2013cv00131
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Frederick Bennett
Defendant:
Pamela Jean Games-Neely, B. W. Bean and J. D. Schuessler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Barrat et al
as 3:2013cv00128
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Frederick Bennett
Defendant:
Pamela Jean Games - Neely, B. W. Bean, J. D. Schuessler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods et al v. Bennett et al
as 2:2012cv03592
Plaintiff:
Timothy Woods , Doris Jeanie Woods , Mallory Woods and others
Defendant:
Wetzel Bennett, Ronnie L. McClung, M. Z. Deitz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2011cv00103
Petitioner:
Jonathan Frederick Bennett
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Motion for Return of Property
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00650
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
