Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Guy v. Bundy
as 4:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
Bennie David Guy
Defendant:
Warden B Bundy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guy v. Bundy
as 6:2023cv00423
Plaintiff:
Bennie David Guy
Defendant:
Warden B Bundy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guy v. Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 6:2022cv00407
Plaintiff:
Bennie David Guy
Defendant:
Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, David Guiterriez and Rissie Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guy v. Trump et al
as 1:2018cv03323
Plaintiff:
Bennie David Guy
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump and The Trump Plaza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guy v. Mathews et al
as 6:2016cv01303
Plaintiff:
Bennie David Guy
Defendant:
Beverly Mathews, Gregg County, Texas, City of Longview, Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennie Guy v. Lisa Channell, et al
as 12-3344
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Bennie David Guy
Defendant - Appellee:
Lisa Calhoun Channell, DNA Examiner, Arkansas State Crime Lab, Kermit B. Channell, DNA Examiner, Arkansas Site Crime Lab, State of Arkansas and others
Guy v. Channell et al
as 4:2012cv00481
Plaintiff:
Bennie David Guy
Defendant:
Lisa Calhoun Channell, Kermit B Channell, Arkansas, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennie Guy v. Dave Parkman, et al
as 11-2836
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Bennie David Guy
Defendant - Appellee:
Dave Parkman, Sheriff, St. Francis County, Glen Ramsey, Detective, St. Francis County Sheriff's Department, State of Arkansas and others
Bennie Guy v. Ed Laxton, et al
as 11-2676
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Bennie David Guy
Defendant - Appellee:
Ed Laxton, County Investigator, Crittenden County, AR and Chet Dunlap, Attorney, Poinsette County
Guy v. Laxton et al
as 3:2011cv00084
Plaintiff:
Bennie David Guy
Defendant:
Ed Laxton and Chet Dunlap
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
