Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Robinson #182351 v. Bush et al
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
James Robinson #182351
Defendant:
Jermey Bush, James Corrigan, K. Benoit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reeder #512651 v. Benoit
as 2:2023cv00242
Plaintiff:
Terry Reeder #512651
Defendant:
Unknown Benoit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles McGlothan v. [unknown] Aikens, et al
as 23-1787
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES MELVIN MCGLOTHAN
Defendant / Appellee:
A. AIKENS, Mailroom Staff, personal capacity, MICHAEL LACROSSE, Resident Unit Manager, personal capacity, K. BENOIT, Business Office Manager, personal capacity and others
McGlothan #845357 v. Aikens et al
as 2:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
Charles McGlothan #845357
Defendant:
Unknown Aikens, Unknown Lacrosse, K. Benoit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benoite v. USA
as 7:2023cv00050
Petitioner:
Shelton John Benoite
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tocarchick v. Fouts et al
as 2:2022cv12545
Plaintiff:
Susan Tocarchick
Defendant:
Jim Fouts, Holly Nunn, Christran Benoit and others
Atkins #742687 v. Dawdy et al
as 2:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
Allen Atkins #742687
Defendant:
David Dawdy, Unknown Party #1, J. Fair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. Butler County et al
as 1:2022cv00380
Plaintiff:
Estate of Cody Bohanan and Victoria Matthews
Defendant:
Butler County, Sheriff Richard K Jones, Medical Director Dr. Anthony Abdullah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benoit v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04850
Plaintiff:
Carla Benoit
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Benoit v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01430
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Benoit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
