Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Chappell v. McCooey et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00293
Plaintiff:
Leon Chappell
Defendant:
Tracy S. McCooey, Blair Benson, Paul Esco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 2:2015cv00652
Plaintiff:
Melissa Benson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Benson v. Thomas, et al. (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00554
Plaintiff:
Thomas Benson
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas and Christopher Gordy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00980
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Chappell v. McCooey et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00811
Plaintiff:
Leon Chappell
Defendant:
Tracey McCooey, Blair Benson and Montgomery Co. Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mulvaney v. Meeks et al
as 2:2013cv00677
Plaintiff:
Trista C. Mulvaney
Defendant:
Dennis Meeks , Preston Hughes , Jeffrey Reasons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bedsole v. Meeks et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00613
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Bedsole
Defendant:
Dennis Meeks, Preston Hughes, Dr. McWatters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chappell v. McCooey et al
as 2:2013cv01347
Plaintiff:
Leon Chappell
Defendant:
Tracy McCooey, Blair Benson, Montgomery Co. Courtroom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benson v. Daniels et al
as 4:2013cv01025
Petitioner:
Winston Benson
Respondent:
Leeposey Daniels and The Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Public Accommodations)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
