Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Cherry Hill Dental, Inc. et al v. Bentley Motors, Inc.
as 2:2022cv04159
Plaintiff:
Cherry Hill Dental, Inc. and Anthony G Gadbois
Defendant:
Bentley Motors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00998
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aikens v. Norman et al
as 6:2018cv03398
Defendant:
Creek, Trista Kinder, Chada and others
Plaintiff:
LeVar Clinton Aikens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scheina v. Sigman et al
as 6:2018cv03169
Plaintiff:
Harry Anthony Scheina, III
Defendant:
James Sigman, Jennifer Unknown, Bentley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ayala et al v. Mission Group Kansas, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00885
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Ayala , Jennifer Decker , Christi Hampton and others
Defendant:
Mission Group Kansas, Inc. , Board of Directors of Mission Group Kansas, Inc. , John Mucci and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Clinton et al
as 6:2012cv03348
Plaintiff:
Scottsdale Insurance Company
Defendant:
Bentley Clinton, Jason Clinton, Natalie Clinton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bentley v. Astrue
as 2:2011cv04248
Plaintiff:
Johnnie M. Bentley
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Robinson v. Yisroel et al
as 4:2009cv00034
Plaintiff:
Terence Robinson
Defendant:
Billie Yisroel, Rosemary Caston, Norma G Washam and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jaco v. Astrue
as 4:2008cv00482
Plaintiff:
Bentley Jaco
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Bentley v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 4:2008cv00287
Plaintiff:
Jodie Bentley
Defendant:
American Family Mutual Insurance Company and Kathleen A. McCool
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
