Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Hasch v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00310
Plaintiff:
Berlin F Hasch, II
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of Social Security Decision (DIWC)
Absher v. Berlin et al
as 1:2020cv13383
Defendant:
Kim Spicer, Brittany Wicks, Dorothy Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Amanda Absher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv13879
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Ambler #188312 v. Washington et al
as 2:2016cv00148
Plaintiff:
Leo Michael Ambler #188312
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Carmen Plamer, Gregory Skipper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Livonia Employees' Reitrement System v. Talmer Bancorp, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv12229
Plaintiff:
Livonia Employees' Reitrement System
Defendant:
Talmer Bancorp, Inc., Chemical Financial Corporation, Gary Torgow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bushansky v. Talmer Bancorp, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv11511
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
Talmer Bancorp, Inc., Gary Torgow, David T. Provost and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
NICHOLL v. Torgow et al
as 1:2016cv11482
Plaintiff:
KEVIN NICHOLL
Defendant:
Gary Torgow, David T. Provost, Arthur A. Weiss and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
SCIABACUCCHI v. Torgow et al
as 1:2016cv11261
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW SCIABACUCCHI
Defendant:
Gary Torgow, Gary Collins, Jennifer M. Granholm and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv14383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
LAMOTTE v. HOUSTOULAKIS et al
as 2:2015cv12218
Plaintiff:
KURTIS JAMES LAMOTTE
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER HOUSTOULAKIS, SERGEANT DICKEY, DETECTIVE SGT. SHOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
