Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Turner v. Bryant et al
as 2:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
James Hope Turner, 3x
Defendant:
Martin T. Bryant, Beth Cabel, Clifford Mcdonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. McCoy et al
as 3:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Carter
Defendant:
Kevin McCoy, C. J. Smith, C. Boone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Virginia Department Of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Kevin Johnson
Defendant:
Virginia Department Of Corrections, Chadwick S. Dotson, A. David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Krug v. Clarke et al
as 2:2023cv00678
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brian Krug
Defendant:
Mr. Harold Clarke, Ms. Beth Cabell, Mr. Kemsy Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stith v. Cabell
as 2:2023cv00426
Petitioner:
Thomas D. Stith
Respondent:
Beth Cabell and Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White, II v. Cabell
as 2:2023cv00280
Petitioner:
Darrell White, II
Respondent:
Beth Cabell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Cabell et al
as 2:2023cv00274
Plaintiff:
Shawn Martin
Defendant:
Beth Cabell, Martin Byrant, Terra Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keesecker v. Cabel
as 3:2023cv00345
Petitioner:
Michael Keesecker
Respondent:
Beth Cabel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bagley v. Cabell
as 2:2023cv00210
Petitioner:
Paul Wayne Bagley
Respondent:
Beth Cabell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Via v. Clarke et al
as 3:2023cv00318
Plaintiff:
Robert King Via, Jr.
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, K. Crosby, Beth Cabell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
