Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Morton v. D.R. Horton, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00091
Plaintiff:
Michael Morton, Lisa Morton, Jeremy Smith and others
Defendant:
D.R. Horton, Inc., D.R. Horton, Inc.-Birmingham, Bethel Engineering and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Swindle v. Swift Transportaion Co of Arizona et al
as 2:2021cv00801
Defendant:
Vivian Arnold Bethel and Swift Transportation Co of Arizona LLC
Plaintiff:
Maci Swindle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bethel v. Harden et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00222
Plaintiff:
Garron Van Bethel and Gaaron Van Bethel
Defendant:
Kenny Harden, Serena Smith, Sabrina Stone Brundy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Revere v. Montgomery County Jail et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2015cv00875
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Revere
Defendant:
Wanda Robinson, Donte Gordon, Donnie Bethel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Muhammad et al
as 2:2014cv00592
Plaintiff:
Kalim A.R. Muhammad
Defendant:
Brenda L. Bethel Muhammad, La Jenna Hatcher, William H. Steele and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bethel v. Bentley et al
as 5:2014cv00737
Plaintiff:
Gaaron Van Bethel
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Luther Strange, Charlette Tesmer and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Bethel et al
as 2:2013cv00030
Plaintiff:
Kalim A.R. Muhammad
Defendant:
Brenda L. Bethel Muhammad, Wanda Goodwin, Alabama DHR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bethel v. Carter et al
as 5:2012cv01153
Plaintiff:
Gaaron Van Bethel
Defendant:
Bettinna Carter, S Carroll, T Drake and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
