Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv00481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 re Job Discrimination (Religion)
Aery v. Bethel et al
as 0:2022cv00456
Plaintiff:
James Paul Aery
Defendant:
Port Bethel, Sue Girot and Employees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv03236
Plaintiff:
Bethel Richardson
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Weisbrod et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv01077
Plaintiff:
Mark Weisbrod , Ernest Cole, II , Lawrence V. Cutts, Sr. and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rachuy v. Bethel Work Release et al
as 0:2017cv00508
Petitioner:
Gale Allen Rachuy
Respondent:
Bethel Work Release and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cuff v. Boen-Boom et al
as 0:2013cv01047
Plaintiff:
Damon W Cuff
Defendant:
Tom Boen-Boom, Mission Healthcare LLC, Bethel Care Center, L.P. and others
Bethel v. James Hardie Building Products, Inc.
as 0:2012cv02728
Plaintiff:
Brian Bethel
Defendant:
James Hardie Building Products, Inc.
Bethel et al v. Darwin Select Insurance Company
as 0:2011cv02242
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Bethel, II and Jennifer Kalsow Frantz
Defendant:
Darwin Select Insurance Company
Counter_claimant:
Darwin Select Insurance Company
Counter_defendant:
Charles E. Bethel, II and Jennifer Kalsow Frantz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker v. Bethel Care Center, L.P.
as 0:2011cv01642
Plaintiff:
Erika Walker
Defendant:
Bethel Care Center, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Boles et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 0:2008cv06001
Plaintiff:
Bruce Boles, Bruce Boles, Bruce Boles and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
