Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Chandler Drive Partners LLC v. Bey
as 1:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
Chandler Drive Partners LLC doing business as Bel-Air
Defendant:
Arsenio Damar Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
El-Bey v. Warden at FMC Lexington et al
as 5:2023cv00184
Plaintiff:
Jttonali One Eye El-Bey
Defendant:
Warden at FMC Lexington and C.O. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
El-Bey v. FMC Lexington et al
as 5:2022cv00067
Plaintiff:
Jttonali One Eye El-Bey
Defendant:
FMC Lexington and Ofc. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bey v. Meade County Detention Center et al
as 3:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
Selassie Bey
Defendant:
Meade County Detention Center, Jailer JJ, Chief Deputy Jailer Brandon Finch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Weems-Bey v. US District Court Bankruptcy in Oregon
as 5:2021cv00047
Defendant:
US District Court Bankruptcy in Oregon
Plaintiff:
Adrian Lamar Weems-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey v. Raque et al
as 3:2020cv00793
Defendant:
Trevor Ford, Walter Sholar, Jennifer E. Porter and others
Plaintiff:
Nazir Abdullah Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bey v. Robert F. Stephens Circuit Court et al
as 5:2019cv00316
Defendant:
Lexington Police Department, Lou Ann Red Corn, Heather McGregger and others
Plaintiff:
Noble Jerome Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moose-Bey v. United States et al
as 6:2018cv00317
Defendant:
Kenneth Michael Warner, United States, David M. Ketchmark and others
Plaintiff:
Thirplus Tino Moose-Bey and Thirplus Moose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jointer v. Franklin County Regional Jail et al
as 3:2018cv00063
Defendant:
Franklin County Regional Jail, John or Jane Does, Lt. D. Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Bey and Jerome Jointer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells-Bey v. Kizziah
as 7:2017cv00178
Petitioner:
Rodorrio Wells-Bey
Respondent:
Gregory Kizziah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
