Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Biggs v. Rapides Parish Detention Center III, et al
as 1:2022cv06226
Plaintiff:
Ashton Dean Biggs
Defendant:
Rapides Parish Detention Center III, Ronald Goudeau and Donald Goudeau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Biggs v. Warden
as 2:2022cv02087
Plaintiff:
Ashton Biggs
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hicks v. Biggs et al
as 6:2018cv00438
Plaintiff:
Dude Hicks and Larry Coleman Hicks
Defendant:
David Biggs and Matt Bingham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phinney v. Pasadena Police Department et al
as 4:2016cv03105
Plaintiff:
William E Phinney
Defendant:
Pasadena Police Department, Biggs, Unknown Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calletano Galarza-Morales v. Terry Means, et al
as 16-10476
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALLETANO GALARZA-MORALES
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRY R. MEANS, United States District Judge, JEFFREY L. CURETON, United States Magistrate Judge, SHAWN SMITH, Assistant United States Attorney and others
Galarza-Morales v. Means et al
as 4:2016cv00140
Plaintiff:
Calletano Galarza-Morales
Defendant:
Terry R. Means, Jeffrey L Cureton, Shawn Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bart Moore v. Anthony Collins, et al
as 11-20018
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BART THOMAS MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY COLLINS, Warden, VONDA RAFTER, Former Captain, LT. RIVERS and others
Fountain v. Prince et al
as 3:2010cv00773
Defendant:
Daniel Biggs and Howard Prince
Plaintiff:
Joseph Fountain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Biggs v. Hardy et al
as 4:2008cv02672
Plaintiff:
Phil A. Biggs
Defendant:
Jonathan Hardy, The Leidel Center and Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
