Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Melton v. Rafferty (MAG+)
as 1:2023cv00641
Plaintiff:
Elbert Melton, Jr.
Defendant:
Bill Rafferty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Melton v. Houston Co. et al (MAG+)
as 1:2023cv00583
Plaintiff:
Elbert Melton, Jr.
Defendant:
Houston Co., Town of Gordon, Bill Rafferty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Price v. Brazier et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2022cv00311
Plaintiff:
Lee E. Price, III
Defendant:
James Brazier, Donald Valenza, Bill Rafferty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Britt v. Houston County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2021cv00241
Plaintiff:
Alkeem J. Britt
Defendant:
Bill Rafferty, James Brazier, Thomas Marsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elliott v. Valeska et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2019cv00235
Defendant:
Douglas A. Valeska, Bill Rafferty, Jackie Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Gene Chandler Elliott, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russ v. Valenza et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2018cv00718
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Russ
Defendant:
CO Champion, Commander Braizer, Jason Smoak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fulgham v. Champion et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2018cv00094
Plaintiff:
Cody Lee Fulgham
Defendant:
Sgt. Champion, Lt. Jones, Lt. Marsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lambert v. District Court of Houston County et al(MAG+)
as 1:2012cv00912
Plaintiff:
Travis Lee Lambert
Defendant:
Circuit Court of Houston County Alabama, Brady E. Mendheim, Jr., Douglas A. Valeska and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drake v. Hughes et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2010cv00668
Plaintiff:
William R. Drake, Jr.
Defendant:
Andy Hughes, Doug Valaska, Donovan Arias and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
