Cases 11 - 20 of 102
CLARK v. HARCHA, III et al
as 2:2023cv00385
Plaintiff:
DEJON LAMAR CHRISTOPHER CLARK
Defendant:
HOWARD H. HARCHA, III, ANTONY BLINKEN, ANDREW SAUL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
TODD v. RYAN RAMAEL TODD ESTATE et al
as 2:2022cv04777
Plaintiff:
RONNIE RAMAEL TODD
Defendant:
RYAN RAMAEL TODD ESTATE, Not Named Graham Estate, CHRISTINE RIDLEY ESTATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Milsteen et al
as 1:2022cv01654
Plaintiff:
Bill Jones
Defendant:
David Milsteen and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HAREWOOD-BEY et al v. BIDEN et al
as 2:2022cv00169
Plaintiff:
DIANA HAREWOOD-BEY, LISA WARBUTON-EL and FEDERATION MOORISH SCIENCE TEMPLE OF AMERICA
Defendant:
PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN, GOVERNOR KATHY HOCHUL, JUDGE CLARENCE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DEJESUS v. LUCEY et al
as 5:2021cv05469
Plaintiff:
ALEX DEJESUS
Defendant:
BILL LUCEY and MARTIN GARICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Parkman v. Wolfe et al
as 3:2021cv01371
Plaintiff:
Darryl Parkman
Defendant:
Bill Wolfe, Rob Grimm, Justin Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doye v. Bechtold et al
as 1:2021cv01278
Plaintiff:
De'Lano Doye
Defendant:
Bill Bechtold, Michele Weller, Melyssa Flud and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brett v. Trump et al
as 1:2021cv01059
Defendant:
Mr. Ditrolio, U.S. Marshal Cook, Mr. Gaven and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Conway et al v. Smith et al
as 3:2020cv01486
Defendant:
James L. Brennan, Jr., Tiffany S. Kominski, F. J. Monaghan and others
Plaintiff:
Mark J. Conway, Michael C. Morris and Stephen G. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
