Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
MAGGITTI v. CAPUZZI et al
as 2:2024cv01312
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
JUDGE JOHN P. CAPUZZI, SR., CHRISTOPHER DEBARREN SAROBE, DANIEL R. ROLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Urve Maggitti v. Bret Binder, et al
as 24-1169
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
BRET M. BINDER, DEBRA RYAN, DANIEL E. ROLAND and others
Urve Maggitti v. Bret Binder, et al
as 23-3276
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
HONORABLE BRET M. BINDER, In his Official Capacity as Judge, BENJAMIN D. KOHLER, Esq., Esq., in his Official Capacity as Deputy Prothonotary, ANTHONY T. VERWEY, In his Official Capacity as Judge and others
Urve Maggitti v. Bret Binder, et al
as 23-3277
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
BRET M. BINDER, DEBRA RYAN, DANIEL E. ROLAND and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
MAGGITTI v. HON. BRET M. BINDER et al
as 2:2023cv02273
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
HON. BRET M. BINDER, HON. ANTHONY T. VERWEY, HON. WILLIAM P. MAHON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
H. Orozco v. Kathryn Barger et al
as 2:2023cv04047
Plaintiff:
H. OROZCO
Defendant:
KATHRYN BARGER, JANICE HAHN, SHIELA KEUHL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MAGGITTI v. BINDER et al
as 2:2023cv01184
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
HON. BRET M. BINDER, BENJAMIN D. KOHLER, HON. ANTHONY T. VERWEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Colon v. Wolfset et al
as 1:2023cv00061
Defendant:
Bradley Wolfset, Andrea Binder, Nalea Realty Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Angela Colon
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
