Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00536
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Bingham II v. Harner et al
as 3:2023cv01357
Plaintiff:
Andrew Nathaniel Bingham II
Defendant:
Shawn Harner, Bernard Wojciechowski, Chris Gorki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
GORDON v. BINGHAM et al
as 5:2022cv04996
Plaintiff:
JOHN GORDON
Defendant:
JONATHAN B. BINGHAM, LEHIGH VALLEY HEALTH NETWORK, AMERIHEALTH CARITAS PA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. CITY OF LANCASTER et al
as 5:2022cv03771
Plaintiff:
GREGORY JOHNSON
Defendant:
CITY OF LANCASTER doing business as LANCASTER CITY POLICE BUREAU and JACOB BINGHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. CITY OF LANCASTER et al
as 2:2022cv03771
Plaintiff:
GREGORY JOHNSON
Defendant:
CITY OF LANCASTER and JACOB BINGHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
BINGHAM v. LANCASTER COUNTY et al
as 5:2022cv02769
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA BINGHAM
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY, SERGEANT PHILLIP KLINGER, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MARCUS JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BINGHAM v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
as 2:2022cv00470
Plaintiff:
RHONDA BINGHAM
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KROLL v. HIGGINS et al
as 3:2021cv00207
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. KROLL
Defendant:
WILLIAM J. HIGGINS, JR., ANTHONY ZANONI, MICHAEL O. TWIGG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Bingham v. Knorr et al
as 3:2021cv01697
Plaintiff:
Andrew N. Bingham
Defendant:
CO1 Knorr and CO1 Cebrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
