Cases 21 - 30 of 58
Peppers v. Union-North School Corp et al
as 3:2016cv00073
Plaintiff:
Gregory Peppers
Defendant:
Union-North School Corporation Board of Trustees , Union-North School Corp c/o Bradley Bingham , Mitchell Mawhorter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bingham v. Baker et al
as 1:2015cv11740
Plaintiff:
Jason Bingham
Defendant:
Jennifer Baker, Brad Josephson, Dr. Okeze and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bingham et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv10725
Plaintiff:
William Bingham and Susan Bingham
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc. and Pharmacia & Upjohn Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BINGHAM v. OM SHIVANI, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv00324
Plaintiff:
BRIDGETT S. BINGHAM
Defendant:
OM SHIVANI, INC. and ASHOK PATEL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
SIMMONS v. BINGHAM FARRER & WILSON, P.C. et al
as 1:2015cv00469
Defendant:
BINGHAM FARRER & WILSON, P.C. and EDWARD B. HOPPER, II
Plaintiff:
DARREN LEE SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101 Bankruptcy
Bingham v. Woolsey et al
as 3:2015cv00100
Plaintiff:
Jason Bingham
Defendant:
Derrick Woolsey, James Luth and Assistant Warden Moss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BINGHAM v. ZATECKY
as 2:2014cv00361
Petitioner:
RICKY BINGHAM
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. BINGHAM et al
as 1:2014cv01828
Defendant:
EUGENE BINGHAM, JR. and KEITH WALKER, SR.
Plaintiff:
PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Bingham v. Biomet Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01896
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Bingham
Defendant:
Biomet, Inc. , Biomet U.S. Reconstruction, LLC , Biomet Orthopedics LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bingham v. Kelly et al
as 1:2014cv03411
Plaintiff:
Jason Bingham
Defendant:
Patrick Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
