Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Bird v. Western Transport, LLC et al
as 5:2022cv05060
Plaintiff:
Megan Bird
Defendant:
Western Transport, LLC and Joshua D. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Bird House v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv01002
Plaintiff:
Shaynce Bird House
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Running Bird v. Mertens-Jones et al
as 4:2021cv04197
Plaintiff:
Harold Running Bird
Defendant:
Tammy Mertens-Jones, Douglas Clark, Timothy Reisch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blue Bird v. United States of America
as 5:2021cv05057
Plaintiff:
Geraldine Blue Bird
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blue Bird v. United States of America
as 5:2019cv05050
Respondent:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Geraldine Blue Bird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Blue Bird v. United States of America
as 5:2016cv05058
Plaintiff:
Geraldine Blue Bird
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Blue Bird v. Leningren et al
as 5:2015cv05022
Plaintiff:
Charles Blue Bird
Defendant:
Hiedi Leningren, Thomas Trimible, Robert A. Mandel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Red Bird v. United States of America et al
as 3:2014cv03015
Plaintiff:
Christy Red Bird
Defendant:
United States of America , United States Department of Health & Human Services, Indian Health Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Lee et al v. Ecoffey
as 5:2013cv05019
Plaintiff:
Patrick A. Lee, Floyd Hand and William J. Bielecki, Sr.
Defendant:
Robert Ecoffey, Ruth Brown, Jim Meeks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Running Bird v. Weber et al
as 4:2012cv04187
Petitioner:
Harold Running Bird
Respondent:
Douglas Weber and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
