Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 a Damages in cases of intentional discrim. in employment
John Kalu v. Spaulding, et al
as 23-1103
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN O. KALU
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. SPAULDING, Warden of FCI-Allenwood, K. MIDDERNATCH, Lieutenant/FCI-Allenwood and K. BITTENBENDER, Discipline Hearing Officer (DHO) FCI-Allenwood
Ajaj v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv01455
Plaintiff:
Ahmad M. Ajaj
Defendant:
United States of America, Herman Quay, Paul Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Wallace Mitchell v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 21-3355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALLACE MITCHELL
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Director-Bureau of Prisons, THOMAS R. KANE, Director Federal Bureau of Prisons, HARRELL WATTS, Administrator/Bureau of Prisons and others
Mitchell v. Lappin et al
as 1:2021cv00163
Defendant:
Kevin Bittenbender, Mark Preoria, David C. Young and others
Plaintiff:
Wallace Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BITTENBENDER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv84433
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN BITTENBENDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Lenny Cain
as 20-1801
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, DHO BITTENBENDER, WARDEN SPAULDING and others
Petitioner:
In re: LENNY CAIN
Goodwin v. Hawk-Sawyer et al
as 1:2020cv00606
Defendant:
Darrin Howard, DHO Bittenbender, Warden H Quay and others
Plaintiff:
Joal William Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kalu v. Spaulding et al
as 3:2019cv01621
Plaintiff:
John O Kalu
Defendant:
Mr. Spaulding, K. Middernatch and K. Bittenbender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Venizelos v. Bittenbender et al
as 3:2019cv01219
Defendant:
Warden, FCI - SCHYULKILL, Unknown Lt's, Bord and others
Plaintiff:
John Venizelos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
