Cases 1 - 10 of 136
BITTLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv27960
Plaintiff:
TEDDY BITTLE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BITTLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv04172
Plaintiff:
JASON RAY BITTLE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bittle v. Washington et al
as 2:2023cv11654
Plaintiff:
Nathan Bryan Bittle
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Bialowas, Ward and others
BITTLE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11155
Plaintiff:
GEORGE GREGORY BITTLE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bittle v. City of Charlotte et al
as 3:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Bernard Bittle
Defendant:
City of Charlotte, Charlotte Transportation Center, Unemployment North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bittle v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv12695
Plaintiff:
Richard Bittle
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bittle v. Go Tires Auto Repair
as 3:2022cv00626
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Bernard Bittle
Defendant:
Go Tires Auto Repair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bittle v. North Carolina Division of Employment Security
as 3:2022cv00628
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Bernard Bittle
Defendant:
North Carolina Division of Employment Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bittle v. Sigis El Owl
as 3:2022cv00627
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Bernard Bittle
Defendant:
Sigis El Owl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
