Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Surita et al v. AM General LLC et al
as 1:2015cv07164
Defendant:
Genuine Parts Company, Blain's Farm & Fleet, DRS Sustainment Systems, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Nancy L. Surita and Rojelio Surita
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
LWD PRP Group v. ACF Industries, LLC et al
as 5:2012cv00127
Plaintiff:
LWD PRP Group
Defendant:
ACF Industries, LLC, Accent Strip, Inc, Adena Health System and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
MMI, Inc. v. Baja, Inc., et al
as 2:2010cv00496
Plaintiff:
MMI, Inc.
Defendant:
Baja, Inc. , Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc. , Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack of California and others
Counter_claimant:
Baja, Inc. , Northern Tool & Equipment Company, Inc. , Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc. and others
Counter_defendant:
MMI, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Blain Supply, Inc. v. Running Supply, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00746
Plaintiff:
Blain Supply, Inc., Blain Supply, Inc. and Blain Supply, Inc.
Defendant:
Running Supply, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Running Supply, Inc. v. Blain Supply, Inc.
as 0:2009cv03456
Plaintiff:
Running Supply, Inc. and Running Supply, Inc.
Defendant:
Blain Supply, Inc., Blain Supply, Inc. and Blain Supply, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Type:
Other Statutes
Rizzo v. South Bend Sporting Goods et al
as 3:2009cv00189
Plaintiff:
Tony Rizzo
Defendant:
South Bend Sporting Goods, Pamida Stores Operating Co. LLC, Blain Supply, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Blain Supply, Inc. v. Home Court International 2002, LTD.
as 3:2008cv00643
Plaintiff:
Blain Supply, Inc.
Defendant:
Home Court International 2002, LTD.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Keystone Cons Ind v. Blain Supply Inc, et al
as 1:2002cv01082
Plaintiff:
Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc
Defendant:
Blain Supply Inc and Freeport Farm & Fleet Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
