Cases 41 - 50 of 118
BLAIR v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2019cv00647
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and ROBERT GILMORE
Petitioner:
ZACHARY BLAIR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
THOMPKINS v. CITY OF BLAIR COUNTY et al
as 3:2019cv00082
Defendant:
BLAIR COUNTY PRISON COMMISSIONER, CITY OF BLAIR COUNTY and BLAIR COUNTY PRISON
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DAVID THOMPKINS, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ROBINSON v. BLAIR COUNTY PRISON et al
as 3:2019cv00077
Plaintiff:
RASHAM ROBINSON
Defendant:
Z. STITT, Warden ABBEY TATE and BLAIR COUNTY PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Bundy v. Smith et al
as 1:2019cv00543
Defendant:
Doctor Jaques LeClerc, Diamond Pharmacy, Judith Rowe and others
Plaintiff:
Zakiyyia Bundy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHULTZ v. HOLLIDAYSBURG/BLAIR COUNTY et al
as 3:2019cv00043
Defendant:
BLAIR COUNTY PRISON BOARD, BLAIR COUNTY PRISON, HOLLIDAYSBURG/BLAIR COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
CREIG SHULTZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JOHNSON v. GILMORE
as 3:2019cv00034
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BLAIR COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, WARDEN, SCI GREENE and others
Petitioner:
AKIL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BLAIR v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 2:2018cv01712
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Petitioner:
ZACHARY BLAIR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2018cv02357
Defendant:
Huffman, Scott Miller, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Marcellus A Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2018cv04715
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
BLAIR THOMAS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BLAIR v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2018cv01283
Petitioner:
SARAH BLAIR
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
