Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Blair v. Safeco Insurance Company of America
as 1:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Debra J. Blair
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hi-Lad, Inc. v. Colombo et al
as 2:2023cv00228
Plaintiff:
Hi-Lad, Inc.
Defendant:
James E. Colombo, Robert F. Tebay, David Blaire (sic) Couch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. Lanham et al
as 3:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Patrick Allen Miller
Defendant:
Kelly Lanham, Blaire Watkins and Prime Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Lanham et al
as 5:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Patrick Miller
Defendant:
Superintendent Kelly Lanham and Ofc. Blair Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blair v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
Jess Wayne Blair, II
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Walton v. Blair et al
as 2:2022cv00350
Plaintiff:
Tiffani Morgan Walton
Defendant:
Craig Blair, Grover Miller, Kevin Foreman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Miller v. Commissioner of W.V.D.O.C. et al
as 2:2021cv00240
Defendant:
John Sines, Brian Reed, Kim Blair and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew W. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knotts v. Marra et al
as 2:2021cv00176
Defendant:
WV Forensic Mental Hygiene Examiners Jane and John Doe 1 to 10, WVU Medicine Litigating Council Members Jane and John Doe 1 to 10, Mark Spangler and others
Plaintiff:
Zachary Knotts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Armstrong Hardwood Flooring Company et al
as 2:2020cv00009
Defendant:
Armstrong Hardwood Flooring Company, Blair Louk and Steve Swecker
Plaintiff:
David Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
