Cases 11 - 20 of 92
Davis v. Justice et al
as 2:2018cv01316
Defendant:
Jill Upson, Tom Takubo, Charles H. Clements and others
Plaintiff:
Robin Jean Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 9.55 Acres et al
as 2:2017cv00150
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
9.55 Acres, Rick A. Sharp, Blaire E. Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Blair v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 2:2017cv00135
Plaintiff:
Melissa Sue Blair
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Blair v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv03217
Plaintiff:
Bevelyn Blair
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blair et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02645
Plaintiff:
Cornelia A. Blair and Ronald M. Stubbs
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
Abbott et al v. CSX Transportation, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02302
Plaintiff:
Donna Abbott , Machele Abbott , Anthony Akers and others
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc. and Sperry Rail, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blair v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01826
Plaintiff:
Bambi Blair
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Washington v. West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources et al
as 2:2016cv10189
Plaintiff:
Josephine Louella Washington
Defendant:
West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources and LaDella Blair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Washington v. Gillespie et al
as 2:2016cv10191
Plaintiff:
Josephine Louella Washington
Defendant:
Melissa Gillespie, Melissa Shephard, Meghan Gofreda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
