Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Watkins v. Perry et al
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Marceese Watkins
Defendant:
Bledsoe, John Doe, Tyler Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mobley v. Garrett et al
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Mobley
Defendant:
Garrett, Bledsoe, Edge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lungaho v. Franks et al
as 3:2023cv00257
Plaintiff:
Mujera Benjamin Lungaho
Defendant:
Steve Franks, Robert Case, Dane Barnum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Little Rock Family Planning Services et al v. Jegley et al
as 4:2021cv00453
Defendant:
Marsha Boss, William L Rutledge, Melissa Faulkenberry and others
Plaintiff:
Planned Parenthood of Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma on behalf of itself and its patients doing business as Planned Parenthood Great Plains, Little Rock Family Planning Services and Janet Cathey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv06071
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Sherman v. Cash et al
as 6:2020cv06146
Defendant:
Sheriff Mike Cash, M Morrow, KK Veum and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick L Sherman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Former Guard Keyshawn Bledsoe et al
as 6:2020cv06085
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Dr. Young, Advanced Practical Nurse Mrs. Long and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Steven Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sherman v. Cash et al
as 4:2020cv00952
Defendant:
Brinkley, M Morrow, KK Veum and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick L Sherman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bledsoe v. Kelley et al
as 5:2019cv00279
Defendant:
Moody, Wendy Kelley and Doe
Plaintiff:
Justin M Bledsoe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Payne et al
as 1:2018cv00082
Defendant:
Hearington, Foster, Allbritton and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa R Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
