Cases 11 - 20 of 123
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2022cv00265
Defendant:
Anthem Inc formerly known as WELLPOINT INC doing business as Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company doing business as Blue Cross of California doing business as BLUE CROSS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA doing business as Blue Cross of Northern C, Independence Health Group Inc and Independence Hospital Indemnity Plan Inc, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Hoover et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association et al
as 2:2022cv00261
Defendant:
Highmark Inc doing business as Blueshield of Northeastern New York formerly known as HealthNow Systems, Inc. formerly known as HealthNow New York Inc, Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida Inc and others
Plaintiff:
John Hoover, Sharon Zebley, Erick Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc. et al v. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 1:2021cv12094
Plaintiff:
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF MASSACHUSETTS, INC. and BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF MASSACHUSETTS HMO BLUE, INC.
Defendant:
REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 1:2021cv09101
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, PREMERA and Premera Blue Cross, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Hoover et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association et al
as 1:2021cv23448
Defendant:
Highmark, Inc. doing business as BlueShield of Northeastern New York formerly known as HealthNow Systems, Inc. formerly known as HealthNow New York, Inc., Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
John Hoover, Sharon Zebley, Erick Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alaska Air Group Inc et al v. Anthem Inc et al
as 2:2021cv01209
Plaintiff:
Albertsons Companies Inc Health and Welfare Plan, Walgreen Health and Welfare Plan (Plan No 501), Alaska Air Group Inc and others
Defendant:
Anthem Inc, Aware Integrated Inc and BCBSM Inc d/b/a Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota (together "Aware"), Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BCBSM, Inc. et al v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 1:2020cv01853
Plaintiff:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts HMO Blue, Inc., BCBSM, Inc., Wellmark, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. and Walgreen Co.
Special Master:
Maura R. Grossman
3Rd Party Defendant:
Prime Therapeutics LLC and Omedarx, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Estate of Paul Nelson Chambers v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc.
as 1:2020cv10492
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc. and Blue Cross and Blue Care Elect Preferred Provider Plan, Group No. 0023055170000
Plaintiff:
Estate of Paul Nelson Chambers
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Marra v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 1:2020cv00159
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Charles River Laboratories Plan and Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David P Marra and David P. Marra
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Houston Home Dialysis LP v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2019cv01765
Defendant:
Excellus Health Plan, Inc. d/b/a Excellus BlueCross BlueShield, Anthem Health Plans Inc, National Account Service Company, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Houston Home Dialysis LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
