Cases 1 - 10 of 17
McDonald v. Buchanan County Police Department et al
as 5:2022cv06097
Plaintiff:
Valdez McDonald
Defendant:
Buchanan County Police Department, Patrick Robb, Broadus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stafford v. Precythe et al
as 6:2022cv03067
Plaintiff:
Cody Jo Stafford
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, J. Cofield, Michelle Buckner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv01672
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Blum v. Schmitt
as 4:2018cv01203
Petitioner:
Roger Blum
Respondent:
David Schmitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gavin et al v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00212
Plaintiff:
Sherron Gavin , Leafa Ah Soon , Elaine Arreaga and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. , Imerys Talc America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Orr et al v. Ferrellgas Partners, L.P. et al
as 4:2016cv00809
Plaintiff:
Robert Orr , Eric Blum , Paul Toomey and others
Defendant:
Ferrellgas Partners, L.P., Ferrellgas, L.P. and Amerigas Partners, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Blum v. USA
as 4:2016cv00782
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Chester Blum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Punzo v. Strong et al
as 5:2015cv06100
Plaintiff:
Christopher Allen Punzo
Defendant:
Mike Strong, Blum, Joe Lysaght and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Geitz et al v. Koster et al
as 4:2015cv00269
Plaintiff:
James B. Geitz, Roger Blum and Kenneth Christner
Defendant:
Chris Koster, George A. Lombardi, Ellis McSwain, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blum v. Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
as 4:2013cv02461
Defendant:
Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Randee Blum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
