Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Dartora v. United States of America et al
as 4:2020cv05161
Defendant:
Susan Dibbins, Chad Wolf, Kenneth T Cuccinelli and others
Plaintiff:
Carla Dartora
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01427
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv01928
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv01871
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-15942
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-35344
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nicolas Nibikora, et al v. Jefferson Sessions, III, et al
as 18-55368
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NICOLAS NIBIKORA and CLEMENT NIKURUNZIZA, individually, and as siblings
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, THOMAS D. HOMAN, in his official capacity as Deputy Director of the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Nicolas Nibikora et al v. Jefferson B. Sessions III et al
as 8:2018cv00305
Defendant:
Thomas D. Homan, Board of Immigration Appeals, James McHenry and others
Plaintiff:
Nicolas Nibikora, CA and Clement Nikurunziza
Michael Bitton et al v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 2:2017cv07617
Plaintiff:
Michael Bitton and Merav Buskila Ederi
BIA:
Board of Immigration Appeals
Defendant:
Executive Office for Immigration Review
USCIS:
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00879
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
