Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Bobbitt v. Martuscello III
as 1:2023cv04909
Plaintiff:
Richard Bobbitt
Defendant:
Daniel F. Martuscello III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bobbitt v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv01745
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Dione O Bobbitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Samuels v. Bobbitt et al
as 1:2019cv00576
Plaintiff:
Sophia Samuels
Defendant:
Maya Bobbitt and Philip Bobbitt
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bobbitt et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11886
Plaintiff:
Richard Solomon, Joseph Scattareggia, Kevin Skinner and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Abdou et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11856
Plaintiff:
Abdou Mohamed, Rodolfo Salcedo, John Hurley and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Berman v. Perez et al
as 1:2017cv02757
Plaintiff:
Simon Berman
Defendant:
Perez, Williams, Brian Weise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bobbitt et al v. The Estate of Stafford Obrutse et al
as 1:2014cv08989
Plaintiff:
Hugh W. Bobbitt and Georgetown Equity Advisors, Ltd.
Defendant:
The Estate of Stafford Obrutse, Imoniyame Holdings, Ltd., Ufuoma O. Emore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bobbitt v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv04357
Plaintiff:
Jamar Bobbitt
Defendant:
City of New York and John and Jane Does 1-10, et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv00751
Plaintiff:
Shockkia Bobbitt and Remo Robinson
Defendant:
City of New York, Detective Steve Lafortune and Police Officers John Doe 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Duke v. Perrino et al
as 1:2013cv08091
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Duke
Defendant:
Perrino, Christopher, Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
