Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 3,264
Singleton v. Lumpkin
as 3:2024cv00087
Petitioner: Durrell Singleton
Defendant: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Valier v. Lumpkin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv01165
Petitioner: Nkrumah Lumumba Valier
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv00118
Petitioner: Herbert Charles Clark
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Puente v. Lumpkin
as 24-40190
Petitioner: Luis Fernando Puente
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Kie v. Lumpkin
as 24-40193
Petitioner: Michael Wayne Kie
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Clark v. LumpkinCase transferred to Eastern District of Texas - Beaumont Division.
as 3:2024cv00083
Petitioner: Herbert Charles Clark
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cardenas v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01138
Petitioner: Isaac Cardenas
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonner v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01129
Petitioner: Ryan Rydell Bonner
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guzman v. Lumpkin
as 24-40186
Petitioner: Jose Garduno Guzman
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Mason v. Lumpkin
as 24-10244
Petitioner: Deondray Raymond Mason
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?