Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv21174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
In re: Jean-Elie Charlemagne
as 24-11225
Petitioner:
In re: JEAN-ELIE URIEL CHARLEMAGNE
Respondent:
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, COMMISSIONER, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES and others
Charlemagne v. The State of Florida et al
as 1:2023cv24533
Plaintiff:
Jean-Elie Uriel Charlemagne
Defendant:
The State of Florida, Attorney General Ashley Moody, Commisioner Nicole Fried and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wilson v. Taylor et al
as 1:2019cv03533
Defendant:
O. Taylor, Zwirn, Annable and others
Plaintiff:
Terance D. Wilson
Interested Party:
TO THE CASE MANAGER/INMATE COORDINATOR OF: Terance D. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bodan v. Glowmar Inc et al
as 1:2019cv20667
Defendant:
Gloria Giappi and Glowmar Inc
Plaintiff:
Eloisa B Bodan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BODAN et al v. CG RYC, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv24530
Plaintiff:
NANCY BODAN
Defendant:
CG RYC, LLC , CG MIAMI RIVER LLC , FOOD AND LEVERAGE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Charlemagne et al v. State of Florida et al
as 1:2016cv20172
Plaintiff:
Jean-Elie Uriel Charlemagne and Emmanuel Michael Charlemagne
Defendant:
State of Florida, Miami-Dade Corrections, Turner Guilford Knight Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015at00401
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00732
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-14389
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
