Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Chaney et al v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00007
Defendant:
Holly Harris, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Kentucky CVS Pharmacy, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
James A. Chaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Eldridge v. Boggs et al
as 0:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
Mark Eldridge
Defendant:
Johnny W. Boggs, Elliott County Fiscal Court, Casey Brammell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boggs v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 7:2021cv00011
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Kristina Boggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00035
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2020cv00151
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Boggs et al v. Mercy Ambulance of Evansville, Inc.
as 6:2020cv00149
Defendant:
Mercy Ambulance of Evansville, Inc. doing business as Lifeguard Ambulance
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Boggs and Kimberly Boggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kelley v. Carter County Detention Center et al
as 0:2020cv00067
Plaintiff:
Matthew D. Kelley
Defendant:
Shawn Moore, Robert W. Boggs and Carter County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Boggs v. USA
as 6:2020cv00100
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Alicia Boggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
White et al v. Trump et al
as 5:2019cv00119
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Frank Doyle, Sergeant Short and others
Plaintiff:
Jason R. White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Belt v. Northeast Regional Health Services Administrator et al
as 0:2018cv00095
Defendant:
Jose A. Santana, Special Agent-In-Charge, FCC - Ashland, KY., Chief Psychologist, FCC/FPC/FCI - Ashland, KY and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Ray Belt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
