Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Boggs v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2021cv00189
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Marvin Boggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boggs v. Tarrant County Clerk of Courts
as 4:2021cv00383
Petitioner:
Harry Lee Boggs, Jr
Respondent:
Tarrant County Clerk of Courts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Norris et al v. United Property & Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 3:2019cv00373
Defendant:
United Property & Casualty Insurance Company and Thomas Boggs
Plaintiff:
Trent Norris and Dayna Owen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boggs v. Salvant et al
as 4:2019cv00386
Petitioner:
Harry Lee Boggs, Jr.
Respondent:
Sharen Wilson, Thomas A Wilder, Wayne Salvant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ashdown v. Denton County Texas et al
as 4:2019cv00099
Plaintiff:
Phillip B Ashdown
Defendant:
NFN Edgar, Denton County Correctional Health, Clair Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashdown v. Denton County Texas et al
as 3:2019cv00106
Defendant:
DCSO Tracy Murphy, NFN Edgar, Denton County Correctional Health and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Ashdown and Phillip B Ashdown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boggs v. Salazar et al
as 5:2018cv00284
Defendant:
Officer FNU Aldania, O. Amadin, Judge FNU Curther and others
Plaintiff:
Harry Lee Boggs, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00583
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Morgan v. Patterson et al
as 2:2017cv00160
Plaintiff:
Joseph Roderick Morgan
Defendant:
Mark Patterson, E Barrera, J Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodgers Patrick v. Martin et al
as 2:2016cv00216
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Dolores Rodgers Patrick
Defendant:
Barry Martin, James Beach, Rowdy Boggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
