Cases 1 - 8 of 8
In re: Subpoenas Served on Marc Penso and Nancy Penso
as 8:2023cv02126
Plaintiff:
Bombardier Transportation (Holdings) USA Inc. now known as Alstom Transport USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 181 Environment: Review of Agency Action
PENSO v. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION (HOLDINGS) USA, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv00474
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW PENSO
Defendant:
BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION (HOLDINGS) USA, INC., PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY and JOHN DOE COMPANY #1-5 (fictitious name)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Deschamps v. Gateway Security, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06392
Plaintiff:
Enilda Deschamps and Enilda Dechamps
Defendant:
Gateway Security, Inc. and Bombardier Transportation (Holdings) USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hernandez v. Bombardier Transportation (Holdings) USA Inc
as 4:2020cv00089
Defendant:
Bombardier Transportation (Holdings) USA Inc
Plaintiff:
Dorcas Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hernandez v. Bombardier Transportation (Holdings) USA Inc
as 3:2020cv00266
Defendant:
Bombardier Transportation (Holdings) USA Inc
Plaintiff:
Dorcas Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Bombardier Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv03044
Defendant:
CSX Transportation Inc., Bombardier Inc., BOMBARDIER TRANSIT CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Bombardier Transit Corporation
as 4:2018cv02326
Defendant:
Bombardier Transit Corporation and Bombardier Transportation (Holdings) USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Shakera Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Quraishi v. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey et al
as 1:2013cv02706
Plaintiff:
Fiza Quraishi
Defendant:
The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey , Bombardier Transportation (Holding) USA, Inc., Capital Contratcors, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
