Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Certain Underwriters At Lloyds, London v. Borden
as 4:2023cv01462
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters At Lloyds, London
Defendant:
Roger Borden doing business as Mountain Lake Home Builders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Borden v. Hamm et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00324
Plaintiff:
Justin Katdeem Borden
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm and Kay Ivey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Borden v. Hamm et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00325
Plaintiff:
Justin Katdeem Borden
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm and Kay Ivey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Borden v. Hamm et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00435
Plaintiff:
Justin K. Borden and Justin Katdeem Borden
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, Rolonda Calloway and Jeffery Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaddis v. Cornelius et al
as 1:2021cv00565
Respondent:
Gray M Borden, John England, Karon O Bowdre and others
Petitioner:
Thomas Gaddis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tucker v. Transamerica Life Insurance Company
as 4:2020cv01558
Defendant:
Transamerica Life Insurance Company and JERRY WAYNE BORDEN
Plaintiff:
Glenda Tucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01880
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Borden v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00437
Plaintiff:
Justin K. Borden
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Jefferson S. Dunn and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Borden v. Wal-mart Stores East LP
as 4:2019cv00382
Defendant:
Wal-mart Associates Inc and Wal-Mart Stores East LP
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Borden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Borden v. Birmingham Heart Clinic PC
as 2:2018cv01547
Plaintiff:
Pamela Borden
Defendant:
Birmingham Heart Clinic PC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
