Cases 41 - 50 of 2,173
Marion Cherry et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv01745
Defendant:
Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval, Inc., Armstrong International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Cherry and Marion Cherry
The:
Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company
Ronald Seguine et al v. Ajax Boiler Inc et al
as 2:2011cv10316
Ued As Successor-by-merger To Buffalo Pumps Inc:
Air and Liquid Systems Corporation
Defendant:
Ajax Boiler Inc, Armstrong International Inc, Burnham LLC and others
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Chief Auto Part:
Autozone West Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Borg-Warner Corporation:
Borg-Warner Morse Tec Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Kragen Auto Supply Co:
CSK Auto Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Cochrane Corporation:
Crane Environmental Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Mundet Cork Company:
Crown Cork and Seal Company Inc
Ued As Successor To Cutler-Hammer Inc:
Eaton Corporation
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Northern Pump Company Fka Northern Fire Apparatu:
FMC Corporation
Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Bendix Corporation:
Honeywell International Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor In Interest To DelavalTurbine Inc:
IMO Industries Inc
Individually And As Successor-in-interest To York International:
Johnson Controls Inc
Individually And As Successor In Interest To Kewanee Boiler Corporation:
Oakfabco Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Abex Corporation:
Pneumo Abex Corporation
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Seguine and Ronald Seguine
As Successor-in-interest To Titusville Forge Company:
Struthers Wells Corporation
Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Zurn Industries Inc And Successor To Erie City Iron Wor:
Zurn Industries LLC
ST. LAURENT v. A.W. CHESTERTON, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv67276
Plaintiff:
RACHEL ST. LAURENT
Defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON, INC. , ALLIED SIGNAL, INC. , AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. and others
Cross_claimant:
ALLIED SIGNAL, INC. , RILEY STOKER CORP. , PNEUMO-ABEX CORP. and others
Cross_defendant:
INGERSOLL-RAND CO. , ALLIED SIGNAL, INC. , CLEAVER BROOKS COMPANY and others
Counter_claimant:
ALLIED SIGNAL, INC. , RILEY STOKER CORP. , PNEUMO-ABEX CORP. and others
Counter_defendant:
INGERSOLL-RAND CO. , ALLIED SIGNAL, INC. , CLEAVER BROOKS COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
St. Laurent v. A.W. Chesterton, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00279
Plaintiff:
Rachel St. Laurent
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton, Inc., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Allied Signal, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
LANSING v. AW CHESTERTON COMPANY et al
as 2:2011cv62392
Plaintiff:
SALLY J LANSING
Defendant:
AW CHESTERTON COMPANY , AURORA PUMP COMPANY , BAYER CROPSCIENCE INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MACKEY, JR et al v. AW CHESTERTON et al
as 2:2011cv60076
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L MACKEY, JR and DIANNE J MACKEY
Defendant:
AW CHESTERTON , BAYER CROPSCIENCE INC , CRANE CO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lansing v. AW Chesterton Company et al
as 2:2011cv00086
Plaintiff:
Sally J Lansing
Defendant:
AW Chesterton Company , Aurora Pump Company , Bayer Cropscience Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mackey et al v. AW Chesterton et al
as 2:2011cv00043
Plaintiff:
Robert L Mackey, Jr and Dianne J Mackey
Defendant:
AW Chesterton , Bayer Cropscience Inc , Borg Warner Morse TEC Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GROVES v. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv78932
Plaintiff:
LINDA GROVES
Defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, ALLIED SIGNAL, INC., ANCHOR PACKING CO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEWIS et al v. AQUA-CHEM INC et al
as 2:2010cv67164
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DEWEY LEWIS and NANCY L DELEON
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM INC , BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC INC , CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
