Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Gillis, et al. v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, et al.
as 1:2022cv11733
Plaintiff:
Robert J Gillis
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, as Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Alfa Laval Inc., Ametek, Inc., individually and as successor to Schutte & Koerting and others
Cross Defendant:
Blackmer, BNS Co., Carrier Corporation and others
Cross Claimant:
Crosby Valve, LLC, General Electric Company, Harvard University and others
Interested Party:
Industry Products Company
Not Classified By Court:
Judge Donald L Cabell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Ciano v. Greater Boston Properties, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv10269
Plaintiff:
Steven Ciano
Defendant:
Greater Boston Properties, Inc. and DOES 1- 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maryland Casualty Company v. Burns Mechanical Corp, et al
as 1:2013cv11227
Plaintiff:
Maryland Casualty Company
Defendant:
Burns Mechanical Corp., Connaughton Construction Corp , Greater Boston Properties, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Matouk v. Marriot International, Inc., et al
as 1:2011cv12294
Plaintiff:
Fadia Matouk
Defendant:
Marriott International Inc. , Boston Properties, Inc. , Boston Properties Limited Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv11050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218 (2) Americans with Disabilities Act
Strahan v. Simon Property Group, et al
as 09-1028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD MAX STRAHAN
Defendant - Appellee:
SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, BOSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, BOSTON PROPERTIES, INC. and others
Strahan v. Simon Property Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv10764
Plaintiff:
Richard Max Strahan
Defendant:
Simon Property Group, Inc., Commissioner, City Of Boston Police Department, Boston Properties, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
