Cases 1 - 10 of 318
Sherfield v. Gibbs et al
as 5:2024cv00393
Plaintiff:
Noble DeAngelo Sherfield
Defendant:
Anthony Gibbs, Mike Lanoy, Katlin Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garcia-Botello v. Garland
as 24-9507
Petitioner:
JAVIER GARCIA-BOTELLO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Botello v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00068
Petitioner:
Daniel Angel Botello
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Tancredi v. Lara et al
as 6:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Rosa Tancredi
Defendant:
Maria Lara, Gabriela Prado, Carol Lee Alvarez Prado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOTELLO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv09991
Plaintiff:
ALEX BOTELLO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BOTELLO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv01583
Plaintiff:
CESAR BOTELLO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marcos Vega v. City Loan Holdings LLC et al
as 2:2023cv07203
Plaintiff:
Marcos Vega, Heide Estrada, Carla Anguiano and others
Defendant:
City Loan Holdings LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, ComVest Capital II Partners UGP, LLC, ComVest Capital II Partners, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
ALICEA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv23610
Plaintiff:
ISRAEL ALICEA, LEROY AHNEE, RICHARD CABBIL and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Alvarado Botello v. Garland
as 23-1820
Petitioner:
MARIA GUADALUPE ALVARADO BOTELLO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Alicea et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02482
Plaintiff:
Israel Alicea, Leroy Ahnee, Richard Cabbil and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
