Cases 1 - 10 of 15
(PC) Bibbs v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2021cv01145
Plaintiff:
Martin J. Bibbs
Defendant:
W. J. Sullivan, Gonzalez, Tyree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin Bibbs v. W.J. Sullivan et al
as 2:2021cv06009
Plaintiff:
Martin J. Bibbs
Defendant:
W. J. Sullivan, Gonzalez, Tyree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Shikeb Saddozai v. Hosey et al
as 1:2019cv01611
Defendant:
K. Hosey and M. Boutte
Plaintiff:
Shikeb Saddozai
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boutte v. Muniz
as 3:2016cv01240
Petitioner:
Wallace J. Boutte
Respondent:
M. L. Muniz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dave Pear et al v. National Football League et al
as 2:2011cv08395
Plaintiff:
Bobby E Abrams, Jr, Stephanie Abrams, Patrice Adams and others
Defendant:
All American Sports Corporation, EB Sports Corp, Easton-Bell Sports Inc and others
Boutte v. Bahr et al
as 3:2008cv02641
Plaintiff:
John Boutte
Defendant:
Bryon J. Bahr, Arlene T. Borick, Daimler Chrysler Financial Services America LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Abbott et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 3:2008cv02662
Plaintiff:
Mary Louise Abbott, Franka Adams, Robert W. Baker and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation, SmithKline Beecham Corporation and McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Boutte v. RGW Construction Inc et al
as 3:2007cv05660
Plaintiff:
John Boutte
Defendant:
RGW Construction Inc and GallagherBassett Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boutte v. The San Francisco SPCA Animal Hospital
as 3:2007cv05661
Plaintiff:
John Boutte
Defendant:
The San Francisco SPCA Animal Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boutte v. Bahr et al
as 3:2007cv05276
Plaintiff:
John Boutte
Defendant:
Byron J. Bahr, Arlene Borick and Daimler Chrysler Financial Services Americas LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
