Cases 41 - 50 of 313
(PS) Gifford v. Hanson et al
as 2:2021cv00119
Defendant:
Clint Dingman, Julie Bowles, Hornbrook Community Services District and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Gifford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Travis Bowles v. Isidro Baca, et al
as 20-17506
Respondent / Appellee:
ISIDRO BACA, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Petitioner / Appellant:
TRAVIS BOWLES
Anita Crider v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc., et al
as 20-17454
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as John Does I-V; Jane Does I-V; ABC Corporation I-V; XYZ Partnership I-V and AMF BOWLING CENTERS, INC., DBA Brunswick Via Linda Lanes
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANITA CRIDER
Nuri Aguilar v. AMF Bowling Centers Inc., et al
as 2:2020cv11451
Defendant:
AMF Bowling Centers Inc. dba Bowlero, AMF Bowling Centers Inc. a corporation doing business as Bowlero and Does 1 to 50, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Nuri Aguilar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Phyllis Colleen Ball v. Bowlero Corporation, et al
as 2:2020cv10050
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Colleen Ball
Defendant:
AMF BOWLING CENTERS, INC. DBA BOWLERO CLOVIS, erroneously sued as Bowlero Corporation, Does 1 to 100, inclusive, Bowlero Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv06335
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv08199
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ocegueda v. Zuckerberg et al
as 3:2020cv04444
Defendant:
Reed Hastings, Mark Zuckerberg, Jeffrey D. Zients and others
Plaintiff:
Natalie Ocegueda
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05901
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
