Cases 41 - 50 of 175
Harrison v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2010cv00044
Plaintiff:
Marqueion Harrison
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Department of Correction, Boyd Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Locklear v. Bennett et al
as 1:2010cv00075
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Locklear
Defendant:
Boyd Bennett, David Mitchell, Maggie Lawler and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Orlando Clark v. Officer Harrison
as 10-6447
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ORLANDO RAPHEAL CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER HARRISON
Defendant - None:
BOYD BENNETT and LAWRENCE SOLOMON
Ellerbe v. Bennett et al
as 3:2010cv00130
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Ellerbe
Defendant:
Boyd Bennett, E.D. Wallace, Rick Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRISON v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2010cv00389
Plaintiff:
MARQUERION J. HARRISON
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, BOYD BENNETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Rankins v. Donnie Stanley
as 10-6211
Appellant:
MICHAEL RANKINS
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JOHN URBANIAK, JR., EDWARD ALLEN, SHAWN DERRICK BONNETT and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DONNIE STANLEY, Sgt., JOHN MEEKS, Capt., THOMAS TART, Lt. and others
JOHNSON-EL v. BENNETT, ET AL.,
as 1:2009cv00985
Plaintiff:
MONTAVIUS A. JOHNSON-EL
Defendant:
BOYD BENNETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. BENNETT, ET AL.,
as 1:2009cv00987
Plaintiff:
ROBERT D. JOHNSON
Defendant:
BOYD BENNETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GEVARA v. BENNETT
as 1:2009cv00981
Plaintiff:
JORGE GEVARA
Defendant:
BOYD BENNETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GEVARA v. BENNETT,ET AL.,
as 1:2009cv00978
Plaintiff:
JORGE GEVARA, ROBERT JOHNSON, STEVEN A. EBRON and others
Defendant:
BOYD BENNETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
