Cases 1 - 10 of 70
THEN v. HOOVER et al
as 2:2024cv01651
Plaintiff:
CARLOS THEN
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER JASON HOOVER, POLICE OFFICER MATTHEW WALSH, POLICE OFFICER JOEY BIANCHIMANO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Boyer v. City of Philadelphia et al
as 5:2023cv02885
Plaintiff:
Andre Boyer and Pennsylvania S.I.T.E.S. Agents, LLC
Defendant:
City of Philadelphia, Lawrence S Krasner, Philadelphia Office of the Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Sandra Rumanek v. Sherry Fallon, et al
as 22-2020
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SANDRA RUMANEK
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERRY R. FALLON, DAVID G. CULLEY, TIMOTHY M. HOLLY and others
Defendant:
MATTHEW DENN and SPILLAN
BOYER v. PITTAOULIS et al
as 2:2022cv01596
Plaintiff:
ANDRE BOYER
Defendant:
Lt. LISA PITTAOULIS, LAURA GUK, POLICE OFFICER HOWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
