Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Gorham v. Nunez et al
as 1:2023cv10663
Plaintiff:
Keely Gorham
Defendant:
George Nunez, Brad Talley, Lindsay Oglesby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Widi v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 21-1085
Defendant:
MARK ARGIR, Correction Officer, FCI Berlin, KEVIN RAMSAY, Correctional Officer, FCI Berlin, NH, RANDY AMENT, Unit Manager, FCI Berlin, f/k/a R. Ament and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES, RANDY AMENT, Unit Manager, FCI Berlin, NH, f/k/a R. Ament and others
Interested Party:
BRIAN PATTERSON
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID J. WIDI, JR.
Woods v. Medeiros
as 20-1664
Petitioner / Appellant:
THOMAS A. WOODS
Respondent:
BRAD COWEN
Respondent / Appellee:
SEAN MEDEIROS, Superintendent
Woollam v. Cowen
as 20-1543
Petitioner / Appellant:
DEREK WOOLLAM
Respondent / Appellee:
MAURA T. HEALEY, Attorney General of Massachusetts and BRAD COWEN, Superintendent of MCI-Norfolk
Pritchett v. Cowen
as 20-1213
Respondent / Appellee:
BRAD COWEN, Superintendent
Petitioner / Appellant:
OASIS PRITCHETT
Pritchett v. Cowen
as 20-1186
Respondent / Appellee:
BRAD COWEN
Petitioner / Appellant:
OASIS PRITCHETT
Walter Raudonis v. RealtyShares Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv10107
Defendant:
Edward Forst, Navjot Athwal, IIRR Management Services, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Walter Raudonis, Brad Honeycutt, David Holland and others
Santana v. Cowen
as 19-1270
Respondent / Appellee:
BRAD COWEN, Superintendent, MCI Norfolk
Petitioner / Appellant:
CESAR SANTANA
US v. Parrilla
as 15-2403
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
LYNDON J. PARRILLA
Interested Party:
WARREN ANGUS, STEPHEN BABIN, ARTHUR BALDWIN and others
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Caplitz et al
as 1:2013cv10612
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Gregg D. Caplitz , Insight Onsite Strategic Management, LLC , Rosalind Herman and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
