Cases 11 - 20 of 132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Slater v. Scott et al
as 3:2022cv05395
Plaintiff:
Ethan A Slater
Defendant:
Rick Scott, Brad Johanson and Travis Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford v. Scott et al
as 3:2022cv05308
Plaintiff:
Paul Donovan Crawford
Defendant:
Rick Scott, Brad Johansson and Travis Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toppen et al v. Safeco Insurance Company of America
as 3:2022cv05312
Plaintiff:
Jamie Toppen and Brad Toppen
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Torrance v. Scott et al
as 3:2022cv05295
Plaintiff:
James R Torrance
Defendant:
Rick Scott, Brad Johansson and Travis Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tracy v. Scott et al
as 3:2022cv05162
Plaintiff:
Max Daniel Tracy
Defendant:
Rick Scott, Brad Johanson, Travis Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lobdell et al v. County of Spokane et al
as 2:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lobdell and Danielle Lobdell
Defendant:
County of Spokane, City of Airway Heights, Ozzie Knezovich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain et al v. Heimlich et al
as 2:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain, Cobbina Osei-Fosu and Brandako Inc
Defendant:
Caleb Heimlich, Olga Farnam, Marlene Pfeifer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Couch v. Scott et al
as 3:2021cv05804
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lynn Couch, Sr
Defendant:
Rick Scott, Brad Johanson, Travis Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv05735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
