Cases 1 - 10 of 230
Gregory v White County Superior Court et al
as 4:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Isaac William Gregory
Defendant:
White County Superior Court, Brad Wooley, Laura Cosgray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PATTERSON v. OPTUMRX, INC.
as 1:2024cv00689
Plaintiff:
Brad Patterson
Defendant:
OptumRX, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
GREGORY v. WHITE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT et al
as 1:2024cv00613
Plaintiff:
ISAAC WILLIAM GREGORY
Defendant:
WHITE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, BRAD WOOLEY, LAURA COSGRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PATTERSON v. 360CONNECT, LLC
as 1:2024cv00562
Plaintiff:
Brad Patterson
Defendant:
360Connect, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
RAUDENBUSH v. FOX
as 1:2024cv00196
Petitioner:
BRAD RAUDENBUSH
Respondent:
C. FOX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SALAHUDDIN THOMPSON v. THE TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2023cv02094
Plaintiff:
BEVERLEY SALAHUDDIN THOMPSON and BEVERLEY C. SALAHUDDIN THOMPSON
Defendant:
THE TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY, GUNNAR ORTLIEB, BRAD SEIFERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cr - Fed. Question: Civil Rights (Race Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
