Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Yourglich v. Pension Benefit Information LLC. et al
as 1:2024cv11004
Plaintiff:
Brad Yourglich
Defendant:
Pension Benefit Information, LLC and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDonald v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2023cv13199
Plaintiff:
Brad Joseph McDonald
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gorham v. Nunez et al
as 1:2023cv10663
Plaintiff:
Keely Gorham
Defendant:
George Nunez, Brad Talley, Lindsay Oglesby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Walter Raudonis v. RealtyShares Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv10107
Defendant:
Edward Forst, Navjot Athwal, IIRR Management Services, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Walter Raudonis, Brad Honeycutt, David Holland and others
Waterman v. City of Taunton et al
as 1:2022cv10381
Plaintiff:
Brad Waterman
Defendant:
City of Taunton, Joshua DeOliveira and Andrew Pacino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
O'Brien v. Lowell General Hospital et al
as 1:2021cv10621
Defendant:
Fernando Roca, M.D., Lowell General Hospital, Rebecca Gabryjelski, R.N. and others
Plaintiff:
Brad O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Christenson v. Davidson et al
as 1:2020cv11573
Defendant:
David Davidson, Brad Shup and John Donelson
Plaintiff:
Mark C Christenson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Christenson v. Brethren et al
as 1:2020cv11574
Defendant:
Brethren and Brad Shup
Plaintiff:
Mark C Christenson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Carresi v. City of Newton
as 1:2020cv11538
Plaintiff:
Brian Malo, James White, Stephen Hodgdon and others
Defendant:
City of Newton
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Famiglietti vs. Paysafecard.com et al
as 1:2016cv11784
Plaintiff:
Tracy Smith, Alicia Ferdula, Scott Murphy and others
Defendant:
Paysafecard.com, FANDUEL DEPOSITS, LLC, DraftKings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
