Cases 1 - 10 of 10
HOUSE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv20513
Plaintiff:
BRANDON HOUSE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jared Williams v. Toriano Tate
as 22-1056
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jared Williams
Defendant:
Brandon House, Eke Gayden and Juannell Goodwin
Defendant / Appellant:
Toriano Tate, in his individual capacity
HOUSE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv75183
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON HOUSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOUSE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv30208
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON HOUSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HALL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03076
Plaintiff:
NATHAN THOMAS, TONY CAMPBELL, JAMES HARTSON and others
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hall et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02074
Plaintiff:
Nathan Thomas, Tony Campbell, James Hartson and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Brandon House v. Judge Robert McCallum, et al
as 16-3959
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Brandon House
Defendant - Appellee:
Judge Robert McCallum, Clark County Circuit Court, Prosecuting Attorney Batson and Deputy Prosecutor Da Turner
House v. McCallum et al
as 6:2015cv06121
Plaintiff:
Brandon House
Defendant:
Robert McCallum, Blake Batson and Dan Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
House v. Jackson et al
as 6:2015cv06046
Plaintiff:
Brandon House
Defendant:
Casey Jackson, Jason Jackson, Larry Cain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
House v. Jackson et al
as 5:2015cv00134
Plaintiff:
Brandon House
Defendant:
Casey Jackson, Jason Jackson, Larry Cain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
